Let's look at the steps one needs to follow to think geographically when looking at data on a map. |
Step 1: | Display data on a map(s) |
Step 2: |
Look for patterns on the map(s)
|
Step 3: | Analyze the factors that have produced those patterns |
Step 4: |
Draw conclusions about the potential significance
of those patterns.
|
Example Below is a map of cities with a National Hockey League team in 1982. As a side note, the Vancouver Canucks went to the Stanley Cup Final that year, unfortunately losing to the New York Islanders 4 games to 0. As the data has already been plotted, Step 1 of "Thinking Geographically" has been completed. Before proceeding to Step 2, What are two facts that
can be stated based solely on the information given on the map? |
Answer: - The NHL in 1982 had 21 teams (7 Canadian and 14 American) - There were no NHL teams in Mexico - Most NHL teams were located in eastern North America - Most NHL teams were located in the United States |
Step 2: What patterns are evident on the map? (Note: One may bring in knowledge beyond what is given on the map in order to identify the patterns.) Answer: |
Step 3: Why do
these patterns exist? (i.e. speculate, hypothesize, analyze) Answer: - the Northeast United States and
Eastern Canada were the first areas settled in Canada /
United States by Europeans. Therefore, there is the presence
of well established urban centres with significant industrial
development providing revenues and a large enough fan base to
support NHL franchises. |
Step 4: What difference
does it make? (i.e. Who or what could be affected by these patterns?
Why are these patterns significant?) Answer: - Culturally: |
Practice Work
|
©www.coolschool.ca | Press
the
button on the Action menu to proceed. |